Mass Edit Provider Pay Status

Currently to change the pay status you must edit each line of a CG individually. It is understandable that you would not want to change the status of every line every time, but being able to tag multiple lines and change the status would make the process go much faster.

In provider pay records you can set the status of a line (https://rfmsinc.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360009168293-Provider-Pay-Status). If you need to put a job in Do Not Pay status then you have to change each individual provider record line for that CG. It would be nice to be able to tag and change the status for multiple lines at once.

 

10

Comments

3 comments
  • Thank you for your community post.  We review each post carefully when planning for future updates but cannot reply to each comment.  

    Community, if you think this is something which should be added to the software please upvote the initial post.  If you think it should not be included, please down vote.  Either way please leave a comment as to your reason for your vote.  When commenting, it is most helpful to RFMS and your fellow users if you include specific scenarios in your description.

     

    Vote Tips:

    Vote only on the original post not the comments, unless specifically instructed.

    Do not back arrow, it may erase your vote.

    If you have already voted, then vote again the system assumes you are changing your vote, make sure the vote count goes up.  

     

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Comment from multiple Australasia Clients - Creating and sending providers from Sch Pro to Orders is great but then having to manually edit each provider record in order entry to capture the installer AP number lets this process down so, in addition to the above we'd like to be able to mass edit other fields such as, Work Order #, Provider Invoice # etc. 

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Totally agree with Christine. Not being able to tag all the provider records pushed over from schd pro with the same work order number pretty much negates the process being quicker then entering the your own records. 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

New post